Brittany Murphy Poisoned After Supporting Whistleblower — Claim

The mysterious case of Brittany Murphy’s 2009 death just got even more complicated. Her father is now claiming that after Brittany supported a Homeland Security whistleblower, she was under government surveillance — and someone involved with them is responsible for her death.

Angelo Bertolotti is determined to get to the bottom of the suspicious death of his daughter, Brittany Murphy.

Brittany Murphy’s Death — Was She Poisoned By The Government?

Brittany, 32, passed away on December 20, 2009 — her husband, Simon Monjack, 40, died just five months later. And while it was originally due to “natural causes,” Angelo said she was poisoned to death after defending a whistleblower fighting the government.

He said that his daughter was afraid to be in her home because she was under government surveillance who followed her around and tapped into her phone after she publicly backed Julia Davis, a Homeland Security whistleblower. 

Julia was working as border control in California when she said she found security flaws that allowed terrorists in to the U.S. When she later exposed these flaws, she said she was branded as a “domestic terrorist.”

Brittany Murphy: Evidence She May Have Been Poisoned

When Brittany and her husband both died from the same causes — pneumonia and anemia — it rose many eyebrows.

“I called it two weeks after it happened,” one of Brittany’s family members told MailOnline. “You just don’t have two people die like that under those circumstances.”

Angelo didn’t trust the original lab results that claimed Brittany died from natural causes. He took it upon himself to order private hair, blood, and tissue sample tests from The Carlson Company.

The toxicology report read:

Ten (10) of the heavy metals evaluated were detected at levels higher that the WHO [The World Health Organization] high levels. Testing the hair strand sample identified as” back of the head” we have detected ten (10) heavy metals at levels above the WHO high levels recommendation. If we were to eliminate the possibility of a simultaneous accidental heavy metals exposure to the sample donor then the only logical explanation would be an exposure to these metals (toxins) administered by a third party perpetrator with likely criminal intent.

There is a chance that this case will be reopened and examined because of the new evidence.

“The Los Angeles County Coroners Office will most likely have to re-test on their own. Apparently, the LA County Coroner’s Office never tested for heavy metal poisoning,” Los Angeles attorney, Mychal Wilson told HollywoodLife.com exclusively.

So, do you think it’s a possibility that Brittany was poisoned by someone involved with the government?